QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schlesinger, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

On Values and Democratic Policy Making: The Deceptively Fragile Consensus around Market-Oriented Medical Care

Abstract.

Market-oriented strategies, embodied in managed competition, have become the primary focus of contemporary U.S. health policy. This dominance reflects the emergence of a bipartisan coalition of support among political elites. This study traces the historical evolution of elite support for the market and suggests that the consensus favoring managed competition is deceptively fragile, with support riven by cleavages in the values used to judge fairness in the allocation of medical care. A unique data set of matched questions asked of both policy elites and the general public is used to document these differences in ethical norms. The implications of these cleavages help to explain three puzzling aspects of contemporary U.S. health policy: (1) the persisting inability to translate the principles of managed competition into politically feasible reforms, (2) the repeated failures to implement demonstration projects intended to test competitive pricing within the Medicare program, and (3) the inability of state regulations to assuage the public's concerns about managed care. Some prescriptions for a more revealing and effective treatment of market reforms in health policy conclude this study.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. P. Ruger Health, Health Care, and Incompletely Theorized Agreements: A Normative Theory of Health Policy Decision Making Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2007; 32(1): 51 - 87. [Abstract] [PDF]

				N. Ikegami Should Providers Be Allowed to Extra Bill for Uncovered Services? Debate, Resolution, and Sequel in Japan Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2006; 31(6): 1129 - 1149. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J A Etheredge Painting as policy Med. Humanit., June 1, 2005; 31(1): 35 - 36. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Schlesinger, S. Mitchell, and B. H. Gray Restoring Public Legitimacy to the Nonprofit Sector: A Survey Experiment Using Descriptions of Nonprofit Ownership Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, December 1, 2004; 33(4): 673 - 710. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. R. Oliver Policy Entrepreneurship in the Social Transformation of American Medicine: The Rise of Managed Care and Managed Competition Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2004; 29(4-5): 701 - 734. [PDF]

				C. C. Havighurst Starr on the Corporatization and Commodification of Health Care: The Sequel Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2004; 29(4-5): 947 - 968. [PDF]

				M. Schlesinger Reprivatizing the Public Household? Medical Care in the Context of American Public Values Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2004; 29(4-5): 969 - 1004. [PDF]

				M. Schlesinger In the Marketplace for Ideas Affecting Public Policy Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2003; 28(6): 965 - 976. [PDF]