QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (23) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Frankford, D. M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

Scientism and Economism in the Regulation of Health Care

As health care costs continue their apparently relentless rise, it seems to be universally perceived that the United States and western Europe are gripped by a cost crisis. To resolve the apparent crisis, U.S. and western European governments and third-party payers are turning increasingly to a new positivist discipline, called health services research, for which neoclassical health economics is the dominant discourse. However this discipline may actually reinforce the strength of biomedical positivism and the concomitant technological imperative. Like biomedicine, health services research is technologically driven, dependent on "advances" that generate more comprehensive and therefore more "accurate" data. Accordingly, just as biomedicine causes health care workers and patients to depend on technologies for diagnosis and treatment, health services research instills in the body politic dependence on technocratically conceived solutions for political problems. Moreover, because biomedicine and health services research share positivist epistemic and methodological premises, both objectify the subjects they study, abstract those subjects from context, and thereby ignore the cultural dimensions of the problems at hand. Rather than inculcate an ethic and practice in which medicine focuses on the meaning of illness for a life, a cultural phenomenon, this form of positivism strengthens the tendency to reject meaning in favor of the causes and course of disease and the abstracted probability of its occurrence. Accordingly health services research and the forms of regulation with which it is allied threaten to overwhelm the medical humanities movement. Furthermore this scientism precludes the institutionalization of political forums in which we can deliberate on the meaning of medicine, health, and death in our lives.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Social and Political Dis-ease Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 181 - 196. [PDF]

				E. M. Melhado Economists, Public Provision, and the Market: Changing Values in Policy Debate Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(2): 215 - 263. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. E. Malone Whither the Almshouse? Overutilization and the Role of the Emergency Department Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(5): 795 - 832. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Frankford The Normative Constitution of Professional Power Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 185 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF]

				G. S. Belkin The Technocratic Wish: Making Sense and Finding Power in the "Managed" Medical Marketplace Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(2): 509 - 532. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. M. Frankford Institutions of Reflective Practice: Clinical Reasoning: Forms of Inquiry in a Therapeutic Practice Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(5): 1295 - 1308. [PDF]

				D. M. Frankford Institutions of Reflective Practice: Medical Talk and Medical Work: The Liturgy of the Clinic Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(5): 1295 - 1308. [PDF]

				S. J. Tanenbaum Medicaid Eligibility Policy in the 1980s: Medical Utilitarianism and the "Deserving" Poor Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 933 - 954. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Gary S. Belkin Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1994; 19(4): 801 - 808. [PDF]