Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1985 9(4):611-628; DOI:10.1215/03616878-9-4-611
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yesalis, C. E.
Right arrow Articles by Levitz, G. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

The Life and Death of a Field Experiment: A Case Study of Health Care Research in a Hostile Environment

Charles E. Yesalis, III and Gary S. Levitz
University of Iowa

This paper discusses the effects of powerful confounding events on the evaluation of an innovative health care payment program—an experiment with capitation payment for pharmacy services for Medicaid recipients. The research, conducted at the University of Iowa from 1975 to 1982, used a sophisticated experimental design; it was funded by the National Center for Health Services Research, the Health Care Financing Administration, and the State of Iowa, representing an investment of over two million dollars. Despite this investment, and the interest of many at the national level, events in the research environment during this period may well have distorted the conclusions of the research. Thus this case study highlights the problems of conducting evaluation research. particularly social experiments, on innovative programs perceived as threatening to the status quo.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1985 by Duke University Press