Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2006 31(3):671-685; DOI:10.1215/03616878-2005-013
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosenthal, M.
Right arrow Articles by Daniels, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Part IV: The Social Context of Competition Policy

Beyond Competition: The Normative Implications of Consumer-Driven Health Plans

Meredith Rosenthal and Norman Daniels
Harvard School of Public Health

The Federal Trade Commission/Department of Justice 2004 report Improving Health Care: A Dose of Competition appeals to efficiency arguments in promoting a wide range of health care market reforms. But the market-based reforms discussed in Improving Health Care are not simply neutral with regard to equity in access to services; they are likely to have substantial and inequitable distributional effects. We use the case of consumer-driven health plans (CDHPs), the pillar of the Bush administration's private-sector health reform efforts, to illustrate the limitations of viewing health policy reform through the lens of Improving Health Care. We conclude that the speculative efficiency gains from CDHPs need to be balanced against well-documented equity concerns within a normative framework. Moreover, other important ethical issues arise with regard to the risks imposed on the population by the introduction of policies that are based on a faith in markets rather than empirical evidence.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. F. Wharam and N. Daniels
Toward Evidence-Based Policy Making and Standardized Assessment of Health Policy Reform
JAMA, August 8, 2007; 298(6): 676 - 679.
[Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2006 by Duke University Press