|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Part IV: The Social Context of Competition Policy |
Despite the size of their report, the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice pay virtually no attention to tens of millions of uninsured and underinsured persons. By focusing on an increasingly rarified group of health care customershealthy, affluent, and highly insuredthe report takes on an untethered quality, with only the slightest tip of the hat to its own limitations. Furthermore, the report overstates the extent of legal constraints on the market, in particular, the degree to which the market is free to select its customers and tailor its goods and services to the best risks. By miscasting the legal context of the American health care system, the report ultimately undermines much of its potential value.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. V. Rosenau and C. J. Lako An Experiment with Regulated Competition and Individual Mandates for Universal Health Care: The New Dutch Health Insurance System Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 2008; 33(6): 1031 - 1055. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Redman Accountability for patient self-management of chronic conditions; ethical analysis and a proposal Chronic Illness, March 1, 2007; 3(1): 88 - 95. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
|