Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2005 30(6):1003-1026; DOI:10.1215/03616878-30-6-1003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kwon, S.
Right arrow Articles by Reich, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

The Changing Process and Politics of Health Policy in Korea

Soonman Kwon
Seoul National University, Korea

Michael R. Reich
Harvard University

Korea recently introduced three major health care reforms: in financing (1999), pharmaceuticals (2000), and provider payment (2001). In these three reforms, new government policies merged more than 350 health insurance societies into a single payer, separated drug prescribing by physicians from dispensing by pharmacists, and attempted to introduce a new prospective payment system. This essay compares the three reforms in Korea and draws important lessons about the country's changing process and politics of health care policy. The change of government, the president's keen interest in health policy, and democratization in the public policy process toward a more pluralist context opened a policy window for reform. Civic groups played an active role in the policy process by shaping the proposals for reform—a major change from the previous policy process that was dominated by government bureaucrats. The three reforms also showed important differences in the role of interest groups. Strong support by the rural population and labor unions contributed to the financing reform. In the pharmaceutical reform, which was a big threat to physician income, the president and civic groups succeeded in quickly setting the reform agenda; the medical profession was unable to block the adoption of the reform but their strikes infl uenced the content of the reform during implementation. Physician strikes also helped block the implementation of the payment reform. Future reform efforts in Korea will need to consider the political management of vested interest groups and the design of strategies for both scope and sequencing of policy reforms.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Policy PlanHome page
S. Kwon
Thirty years of national health insurance in South Korea: lessons for achieving universal health care coverage
Health Policy Plan., November 12, 2008; (2008) czn037v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
H.-J. Kim and J. P. Ruger
Pharmaceutical Reform In South Korea And The Lessons It Provides
Health Aff., July 1, 2008; 27(4): w260 - w269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2005 by Duke University Press