|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Consultant
Abstract.
The recent decline, indeed perhaps dismantling, of managed care is sometimes treated as both consequence and cause of the political reempowerment of medical providers, whose professional dominance managed care had challenged. Drawing evidence from Round III of the Community Tracking Study of the Center for Studying Health System Change, this article reviews the politics of four "arenas" of managed care regulation—prompt payment, mandated benefits, external appeals, and financial solvency—and concludes that the power of providers is contingent on patterns of coalition and conflict that differ across the discrete arenas. The zero-sum connotations of the "de" and "re" empowerment of providers under managed care fail to capture the subtlety of providers' search for fresh cultural, economic, and political resources in shifting policy contexts.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Kronebusch, M. Schlesinger, and T. Thomas Managed Care Regulation in the States: The Impact on Physicians' Practices and Clinical Autonomy Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2009; 34(2): 219 - 259. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Gray, D. Lowery, and E. K. Godwin The Political Management of Managed Care: Explaining Variations in State Health Maintenance Organization Regulations Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2007; 32(3): 457 - 495. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
V. Gray, D. Lowery, and E. K. Godwin Public Preferences and Organized Interests in Health Policy: State Pharmacy Assistance Programs as Innovations Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2007; 32(1): 89 - 129. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Schlesinger The Anatomy of a Pickle Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2005; 30(3): 315 - 326. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
