Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2004 29(3):397-430; DOI:10.1215/03616878-29-3-397
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Olson, M. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Managing Delegation in the FDA: Reducing Delay in New-Drug Review

Mary K. Olson
Yale University

Abstract.

This article examines the effects of the user fee reform on the speed of drug review in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The results show that even after controlling for increased agency resources, the reform reduced review times among new-drug approvals by 34 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 11 to 51 percent, p = .01). The results suggest that increased agency resources alone cannot explain the reductions in drug-review times. Evidence suggests that other reform-specific factors facilitated the change. Such factors may include the agency's desire to obtain program renewal and secure future fee revenues as well as heightened industry monitoring. Additional results show that there were significant increases in the speed of review for novel drugs in the reform era and for drugs in certain classes that have historically experienced longer delays. The results suggest that the user fee reform has helped politicians manage delegation and reduce delay in new-drug review.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
D. Carpenter, E. J. Zucker, and J. Avorn
Drug-Review Deadlines and Safety Problems
N. Engl. J. Med., March 27, 2008; 358(13): 1354 - 1361.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Management InquiryHome page
S. R. Barley
Corporations, Democracy, and the Public Good
Journal of Management Inquiry, September 1, 2007; 16(3): 201 - 215.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
S. Keyhani, M. Diener-West, and N. Powe
Are development times for pharmaceuticals increasing or decreasing?
Health Aff., March 1, 2006; 25(2): 461 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2004 by Duke University Press