QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Grogan, C. Articles by Patashnik, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

Between Welfare Medicine and Mainstream Entitlement: Medicaid at the Political Crossroads

Eric Patashnik
University of Virginia

Abstract.

As the new century begins, the Medicaid program is arguably at a political crossroads. Over the 1980s and 1990s, policy makers enacted major expansions in Medicaid coverage, offering significant new health benefits to poor women and children and other constituencies. In elite rhetoric and political framing, Medicaid was increasingly cast as a broad-based social welfare entitlement of value to all Americans, including middle-class citizens. Some health care advocates began viewing Medicaid expansions as a potential path to achieving universal coverage in the United States. Yet Medicaid remains a means-tested program that has been repeatedly threatened with policy retrenchment. In this essay, we scrutinize Medicaid's current status and future possibilities from a historical-institutional perspective by tracing its complex evolution since its enactment in the Social Security Amendments of 1965. Our core claim is that decisions made at the time of Medicaid's original adoption have fundamentally set the matrix for struggles over the program's unfolding development. We demonstrate that key ambiguities embedded in the 1965 act created largely unintended opportunities for policy entrepreneurs to broaden Medicaid's scale and scope as well as foreseeable vulnerabilities that must be overcome if Medicaid is to realize its full potential.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. M. Esterling Does the Federal Government Learn from the States? Medicaid and the Limits of Expertise in the Intergovernmental Lobby Publius, December 1, 2009; 39(1): 1 - 21. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Grogan and M. K. Gusmano Political Strategies of Safety-Net Providers in Response to Medicaid Managed Care Reforms Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2009; 34(1): 5 - 35. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. E. Pracht State Medicaid Managed Care Enrollment: Understanding the Political Calculus That Drives Medicaid Managed Care Reforms Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 685 - 731. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. Schlesinger and J. S. Hacker Secret Weapon: The "New" Medicare as a Route to Health Security Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2007; 32(2): 247 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]

				F. J. Thompson and C. Burke Executive Federalism and Medicaid Demonstration Waivers: Implications for Policy and Democratic Process Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2007; 32(6): 971 - 1004. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. Honberg, M. McPherson, B. Strickland, J. C. Gage, and P. W. Newacheck Assuring Adequate Health Insurance: Results of the National Survey of Children With Special Health Care Needs Pediatrics, May 1, 2005; 115(5): 1233 - 1239. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]