QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Syrett, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

A Technocratic Fix to the "Legitimacy Problem"? The Blair Government and Health Care Rationing in the United Kingdom

Abstract.

The work of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence, an agency which has recently been created by Tony Blair's Labour government to provide guidance on best clinical practice to the National Health Service, has generated considerable controversy in the United Kingdom. It has been argued that the role which the institute plays in appraising cost effectiveness, especially of expensive new health technologies, constitutes explicit, national rationing. Although the employment of scientific and evidence-based criteria as the basis of decisions might have been expected to secure legitimacy for the institute—even when its recommendations have the effect of denying access to a particular treatment—the reaction to much of its work so far indicates that this goal has not been fully achieved. While alterations to structure and procedure may be considered as possible means of addressing the agency's difficulties, such proposals are not without problems. Consequently, in the final analysis, the British example may serve as a demonstration that the inherently political nature of priority-setting in health care precludes any easy technocratic solution.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K Baeroe Priority-setting in healthcare: a framework for reasonable clinical judgements J. Med. Ethics, August 1, 2009; 35(8): 488 - 496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Oborn Legitimacy of hospital reconfiguration: the controversial downsizing of Kidderminster hospital J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(suppl_2): 11 - 18. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. P. Cohen, E. Stolk, and M. Niezen Role of Budget Impact in Drug Reimbursement Decisions Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 225 - 247. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Klein Can We Say No? The Challenge of Rationing Health Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2007; 32(3): 539 - 543. [PDF]

				Z. Iqbal, A. Pryce, and M. Afza Rationalizing rationing in health care: experience of two primary care trusts J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2006; 28(2): 125 - 132. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Klein A middle way for rationing healthcare resources BMJ, June 11, 2005; 330(7504): 1340 - 1341. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. C. Gelijns, L. D. Brown, C. Magnell, E. Ronchi, and A. J. Moskowitz Evidence, Politics, And Technological Change Health Aff., January 1, 2005; 24(1): 29 - 40. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Devlin, D. Parkin, and M. Gold WHO evaluates NICE BMJ, November 8, 2003; 327(7423): 1061 - 1062. [Full Text] [PDF]