Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003 28(2-3):473-508; DOI:10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-473
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Light, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Socolar, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Part 3—New Sources of Change?

No Exit and the Organization of Voice in Biotechnology and Pharmaceuticals

Donald W. Light
University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey

Ramón Castellblanch
San Francisco State University

Pablo Arredondo
Stanford University Law School

Deborah Socolar
Boston University School of Public Health

Abstract.

Although leadership is typically seen as coming from the leaders of governments and major institutions, a strong case can be made that concerned citizens first articulate important issues and policies that official leaders then pick up and promote. In a market-based society dominated by large corporations, Hirschman's framework of exit, voice, and loyalty can be used to relate consumer and grassroots movements to markets, when participants believe there is no exit and loyalty (or acquiescence) is not an option. While "voice" is usually applied to the individual or consumer level, this article develops the concept of organized voice and illustrates how it has exhibited leadership in the controversial relations between the biotech and pharmaceutical industries and society as a whole. The essay concludes by urging more research on organized voice as a source of leadership and by outlining some important dimensions for researchers to consider.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social ScienceHome page
D. W. Light
Globalizing Restricted and Segmented Markets: Challenges to Theory and Values in Economic Sociology
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, March 1, 2007; 610(1): 232 - 245.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
D. W Light and J. Lexchin
Foreign free riders and the high price of US medicines
BMJ, October 22, 2005; 331(7522): 958 - 960.
[Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Duke University Press