|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Part 3New Sources of Change? |
Abstract.
The social movement has become institutionalized as a form of political action. The aim of this article is to evaluate the possibilities presented by this form as a strategy to bring about universal health insurance in the United States. I draw on the work of social movement theorists, on the substantial body of empirical research on health-related social movements, and on relevant comparative work from Canada to develop a template for this evaluation. Using that template I compare the failed campaign for President Bill Clinton's health insurance plan with a recent, more successful campaign in the state of New York. I conclude that the keys to success are, first, a broad-based coalition that combines an ideologically and/or grievance-motivated grass roots with financially and politically well-endowed mainstream organizations; second, a "master frame" that resonates with the American people; and, third, a political window of opportunity. The prospects for such a conjunction are not hopeless, but they are not high.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Gottschalk Back to the Future? Health Benefits, Organized Labor, and Universal Health Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2007; 32(6): 923 - 970. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Nathanson Collective Actors and Corporate Targets in Tobacco Control: A Cross-National Comparison Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2005; 32(3): 337 - 354. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. E. Rosenblatt Health Care Entitlements and the Policy Gorilla Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2004; 29(3): 529 - 538. [PDF] |
||||
|
|