Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003 28(2-3):443-472; DOI:10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-443
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nathanson, C. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Part 3—New Sources of Change?

The Skeptic's Guide to a Movement for Universal Health Insurance

Constance A. Nathanson
Columbia University

Abstract.

The social movement has become institutionalized as a form of political action. The aim of this article is to evaluate the possibilities presented by this form as a strategy to bring about universal health insurance in the United States. I draw on the work of social movement theorists, on the substantial body of empirical research on health-related social movements, and on relevant comparative work from Canada to develop a template for this evaluation. Using that template I compare the failed campaign for President Bill Clinton's health insurance plan with a recent, more successful campaign in the state of New York. I conclude that the keys to success are, first, a broad-based coalition that combines an ideologically and/or grievance-motivated grass roots with financially and politically well-endowed mainstream organizations; second, a "master frame" that resonates with the American people; and, third, a political window of opportunity. The prospects for such a conjunction are not hopeless, but they are not high.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. Gottschalk
Back to the Future? Health Benefits, Organized Labor, and Universal Health Care
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2007; 32(6): 923 - 970.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Educ BehavHome page
C. A. Nathanson
Collective Actors and Corporate Targets in Tobacco Control: A Cross-National Comparison
Health Educ Behav, June 1, 2005; 32(3): 337 - 354.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
R. E. Rosenblatt
Health Care Entitlements and the Policy Gorilla
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2004; 29(3): 529 - 538.
[PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Duke University Press