|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Part 3New Sources of Change? |
Abstract.
"Regulation by litigation" is a recently recognized trend in American legal governance that develops differently in each economic sector it affects. In health care, widespread litigation can be viewed as the product of three partial transformations: incomplete industrialization, incomplete consumerism, and incomplete social solidarity. One can argue that the public turns to the courts because other actors who might exercise judgment and authority to resolve problems appear unreliable. Because litigation has several features at odds with sound health policyincluding its cost, its hindsight bias, and its adversarial characterit may be necessary to develop new discretionary institutions to address specific questions that regulators cannot or will not answer.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. A. Miller Federal Administrative and Judicial Oversight of Medicaid: Policy Legacies and Tandem Institutions under the Boren Amendment Publius, January 1, 2008; 38(2): 315 - 342. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. M. Sage and D. N. Kalyan Horses or Unicorns: Can Paying for Performance Make Quality Competition Routine? Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2006; 31(3): 531 - 556. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Davis, R. Lay-Yee, R. Briant, and A. Scott Modeling Eligibility under National Systems of Compensation for Treatment Injury Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2006; 31(2): 295 - 319. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
|