Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003 28(2-3):387-420; DOI:10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-387
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sage, W. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Part 3—New Sources of Change?

Unfinished Business: How Litigation Relates to Health Care Regulation

William M. Sage
Columbia University School of Law

Abstract.

"Regulation by litigation" is a recently recognized trend in American legal governance that develops differently in each economic sector it affects. In health care, widespread litigation can be viewed as the product of three partial transformations: incomplete industrialization, incomplete consumerism, and incomplete social solidarity. One can argue that the public turns to the courts because other actors who might exercise judgment and authority to resolve problems appear unreliable. Because litigation has several features at odds with sound health policy—including its cost, its hindsight bias, and its adversarial character—it may be necessary to develop new discretionary institutions to address specific questions that regulators cannot or will not answer.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PubliusHome page
E. A. Miller
Federal Administrative and Judicial Oversight of Medicaid: Policy Legacies and Tandem Institutions under the Boren Amendment
Publius, January 1, 2008; 38(2): 315 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
W. M. Sage and D. N. Kalyan
Horses or Unicorns: Can Paying for Performance Make Quality Competition Routine?
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 2006; 31(3): 531 - 556.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. Davis, R. Lay-Yee, R. Briant, and A. Scott
Modeling Eligibility under National Systems of Compensation for Treatment Injury
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2006; 31(2): 295 - 319.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Duke University Press