Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003 28(2-3):245-270; DOI:10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-245
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sparer, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Part 1—The Public Sector: A New Federalism?

Leading the Health Policy Orchestra: The Need for an Intergovernmental Partnership

Michael S. Sparer
Columbia University

Abstract.

The past decade provides a useful window through which to examine whether states are likely to provide health care leadership. During this era, states were given increased discretion to set health care policy, they had the financial resources to encourage innovation, and their administrative capacity was at its strongest ever. Despite the favorable conditions, however, states were reluctant to spend their own funds on programs for the uninsured, their efforts to make private insurance more affordable for the small business community were disappointing, and their efforts to regulate the managed care industry fell short. At the same time, though, the most promising innovations over the past decade were in programs financed primarily with federal dollars, administered primarily by state officials, and advanced by an intergovernmental partnership in which administrators at different levels of government prod each other to try and do more. This sort of intergovernmental partnership provides the best model for innovative health policy leadership.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PubliusHome page
E. A. Miller
Federal Administrative and Judicial Oversight of Medicaid: Policy Legacies and Tandem Institutions under the Boren Amendment
Publius, January 1, 2008; 38(2): 315 - 342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Barrilleaux and P. Brace
Notes from the Laboratories of Democracy: State Government Enactments of Market- and State-Based Health Insurance Reforms in the 1990s
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2007; 32(4): 655 - 683.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. S. Sparer
States and the Politics of Incrementalism: Health Policy in Wisconsin during the 1990s
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, April 1, 2004; 29(2): 269 - 292.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Duke University Press