Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2003 28(2-3):195-216; DOI:10.1215/03616878-28-2-3-195
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tuohy, C. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Part 1—The Public Sector: A New Federalism?

Agency, Contract, and Governance: Shifting Shapes of Accountability in the Health Care Arena

Carolyn Hughes Tuohy
University of Toronto

Abstract.

Current ideas about the role of the state include an enthusiasm for mechanisms of "indirect" or "third-party" governance. The health care arena, in which models of indirect governance have a long history, is an important test bed for these ideas. Classically, the arena was marked by trust-based, principal-agent relationships established to overcome information gaps. Over time (and to different degrees across nations), emphasis shifted to contractual relationships assuming relatively well-informed actors and then to performance monitoring and information sharing within complex and loosely coupled networks. In this latest stage, there is a risk that some important features of democratic leadership, and of decision making in the health care arena, will be eclipsed. Accountability mechanisms must clearly locate responsibility for actions and must allow for the exercise of professional judgment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. Grant and K. C. Alfred
Sanctions and Recidivism: An Evaluation of Physician Discipline by State Medical Boards
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2007; 32(5): 867 - 885.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
National Institute Economic ReviewHome page
G. Bevan
Setting Targets for Health Care Performance: Lessons from a Case Study of the English NHS
National Institute Economic Review, January 1, 2006; 197(1): 67 - 79.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. L. Mesich-Brant and L. J. Grossback
Assisting Altruism: Evaluating Legally Binding Consent in Organ Donation Policy
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2005; 30(4): 687 - 718.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
G. Bevan and R. Robinson
The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics: Path Dependency in Health Care in England
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2005; 30(1-2): 53 - 78.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2003 by Duke University Press