Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2002 27(6):977-1000; DOI:10.1215/03616878-27-6-977
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulis, A.
Right arrow Articles by Ubel, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Responding to the Immunoglobulin Shortage: A Case Study

Ann Boulis
Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Susan Goold and Peter A. Ubel
University of Michigan

Abstract.

In fall 1997, a shortage of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) developed in the United States because of increased demand for the product, reduced supply, and product recalls. This shortage is a useful model for understanding how our health care system responds to scarcity. Although the U.S. government took steps to inform the medical community of the shortage, with few exceptions, the government did not respond to the shortage in a timely or effective manner. Instead, it took a relatively passive role, leaving IVIG manufacturers and distributors, health care institutions, and clinicians to fend for themselves. The shortage likely had an uneven impact on patients, based on the relative market strength of the health care institutions in which they received care and the individual patient's ability to absorb the increasing out-of-pocket costs of scarce IVIG. Market mechanisms have now largely alleviated the shortage and significantly reduced its detrimental impact on patients. However, future shortages of IVIG or other scarce medical products, such as vaccines and antibiotics, would benefit from more immediate and coordinated efforts not only to make sure that scarce health care resources are distributed in a just manner but also to identify and remedy the sources of health product supply problems.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
D. Provan, H. M Chapel, W A C. Sewell, D. O'Shaughnessy, and on behalf of the UK Immunoglobulin Expert Working
Prescribing intravenous immunoglobulin: summary of Department of Health guidelines
BMJ, October 20, 2008; 337(oct20_2): a1831 - a1831.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am J Health Syst PharmHome page
J. M. Hoffman, N. D. Shah, L. C. Vermeulen, G. T. Schumock, P. Grim, R. J. Hunkler, and K. M. Hontz
Projecting future drug expenditures--2006
Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., January 15, 2006; 63(2): 123 - 138.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. C. Alexander, R. M. Werner, and P. A. Ubel
The Costs of Denying Scarcity
Arch Intern Med, March 22, 2004; 164(6): 593 - 596.
[Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2002 by Duke University Press