Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2002 27(2):243-260; DOI:10.1215/03616878-27-2-243
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mawson, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Guignard, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Special Section on Terrorism, Guns, and Public Health

Preventing Lethal Violence in Schools: The Case for Entry-Based Weapons Screening

Anthony R. Mawson
Jackson State University

Peter M. Lapsley
Aviation Security Division, Department of Transport, U.K.

Allan M. Hoffman
Des Moines University—Osteopathic Medical Center

John C. Guignard
Guignard Biodynamics

Abstract.

Violence-related behavior in schools has declined in recent years, but the perception of risk remains high. Disturbingly high percentages of students and teachers report staying home out of fear, and many students bring weapons to school for protection. Current proposals for preventing school violence include punishing the violence-prone, expulsion for weapon carriers, and creating a culture of nonviolence through various behavioral methods like conflict resolution. None of these proposals address the issue of lethal violence and hence personal safety. The risk of lethal violence in schools (related mainly to firearms) could be substantially reduced by creating an effective barrier between firearms and people. This could be achieved by using entry-based weapons detection systems similar to those now used in airports and courts. Decreasing the risk and fear of violence by converting schools into weapons-free zones would also be expected to increase attendance and improve scholastic performance. Randomized, controlled studies should be undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of entry-based weapons detection systems for achieving these outcomes.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2002 by Duke University Press