Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2001 26(2):327-368; DOI:10.1215/03616878-26-2-327
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (24)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rosoff, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Evidence-Based Medicine And the Law: The Courts Confront Clinical Practice Guidelines

Arnold J. Rosoff
University of Pennsylvania

This article examines how courts are likely to apply evidence-based medicine, and particularly clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), in healthcare litigation involving quality-of-care and entitlement-to-benefits (coverage) claims. Exploring the "politics" of the current situation, it observes that, just as clinicians have been reluctant to use CPGs in practice, courts have been, and likely will continue to be, slow to apply them in deciding cases., The article analyzes extant and proposed statutory approaches to legitimizing and promoting courts' use of CPGs. It concludes by renewing the author's earlier and controversial proposal to establish a voluntary federal program for certifying guidelines and directing courts to give certified CPGs greater weight in healthcare litigation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
W. D. Graf, H. R. Kayyali, J. J. Alexander, S. D. Simon, and M. C. Morriss
Neuroimaging-Use Trends in Nonacute Pediatric Headache Before and After Clinical Practice Parameters
Pediatrics, November 1, 2008; 122(5): e1001 - e1005.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Acad Psychiatry LawHome page
P. R. Recupero
Clinical Practice Guidelines as Learned Treatises: Understanding Their Use as Evidence in the Courtroom
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law, September 1, 2008; 36(3): 290 - 301.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
D. G. Larriviere and J. L. Bernat
Invited Article: Threats to physician autonomy in a performance-based reimbursement system
Neurology, June 10, 2008; 70(24): 2338 - 2342.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
R. N. Shiffman and A. S. Lieberthal
The Importance of Disclaimers: Distinction Between Optimal Care and Standard of Care: In Reply
Pediatrics, August 1, 2007; 120(2): 455 - 455.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. M. Cheung and J. W. Feightner
Seeking clarification of osteoporosis guidelines
Can. Med. Assoc. J., October 26, 2004; 171(9): 1022 - 1023.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Standards, Guidelines, and Roses
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2003; 181(4): 945 - 950.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
L. Berlin
Duty to Directly Communicate Radiologic Abnormalities: Has the Pendulum Swung Too Far?
Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2003; 181(2): 375 - 381.
[Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2001 by Duke University Press