Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2000 25(6):1083-1120; DOI:10.1215/03616878-25-6-1083
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (32)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lehoux, P.
Right arrow Articles by Blume, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Technology Assessment and the Sociopolitics of Health Technologies

Pascale Lehoux
University of Montreal

Stuart Blume
University of Amsterdam

Abstract.

In a growing number of countries, health technology assessment (HTA) has come to be seen as a vital component in policy making. Even though the assessment of the social, political, and ethical aspects of health technology is listed as one of its main objectives, in practice, the integration of such dimensions into HTA remains limited. Recent social scientific research on the inherently political nature of technology strongly supports such a comprehensive approach. The growing claims by and on behalf of consumer groups also suggest that HTA should be informed by a broader set of perspectives. Using the example of the cochlear implant in children, this essay compares the professed objectives of HTA with typical practice and explores possible explanations for the discrepancies observed. A second example, home tele-monitoring for elderly persons, demonstrates how the types of evidence considered by HTA and the process through which assessments are produced may be reconsidered. We argue for the formal integration of the sociopolitical dimensions of health care technologies into assessments. The ability of HTA to more fully address important issues from a public policy point of view will increase by making explicit the sociopolitical nature of health care technologies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EvaluationHome page
P. Lehoux, M. Hivon, J.-L. Denis, and S. Tailliez
Health Technology Assessment in the Canadian Health Policy Arena: Examining Relationships between Evaluators and Stakeholders
Evaluation, July 1, 2008; 14(3): 295 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
A. Boivin, F. Legare, and M.-P. Gagnon
Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making
J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 79 - 84.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SociologyHome page
C. May
The Clinical Encounter and the Problem of Context
Sociology, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 29 - 45.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. Lehoux, J.-L. Denis, S. Tailliez, and M. Hivon
Dissemination of Health Technology Assessments: Identifying the Visions Guiding an Evolving Policy Innovation in Canada
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2005; 30(4): 603 - 642.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health (London)Home page
M. Rock
Reconstituting populations through evidence-based medicine: an ethnographic account of recommending procedures for diagnosing type 2 diabetes in clinical practice guidelines
Health (London) , April 1, 2005; 9(2): 241 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JBJSHome page
K. J. Bozic, R. G. Pierce, and J. H. Herndon
Health Care Technology Assessment. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1305 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Med Inform AssocHome page
C. May, R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F. Mair, P. Wallace, and for the Telemedicine Adoption Study Group
Understanding the Normalization of Telemedicine Services through Qualitative Evaluation
JAMIA, November 1, 2003; 10(6): 596 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.Home page
C. May, R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F. Mair, and P. Wallace
Understanding the Normalization of Telemedicine Services through Qualitative Evaluation
J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2003; 10(6): 596 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. Satya-Murti
Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice
JAMA, March 20, 2002; 287(11): 1464 - 1466.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Health Informatics JournalHome page
C. May, M. Mort, F. Mair, and T. Williams
Factors affecting the adoption of telehealthcare in the United Kingdom: the policy context and the problem of evidence
Health Informatics Journal, September 1, 2001; 7(3-4): 131 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2000 by Duke University Press