|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
University of Amsterdam
Abstract.
In a growing number of countries, health technology assessment (HTA) has come to be seen as a vital component in policy making. Even though the assessment of the social, political, and ethical aspects of health technology is listed as one of its main objectives, in practice, the integration of such dimensions into HTA remains limited. Recent social scientific research on the inherently political nature of technology strongly supports such a comprehensive approach. The growing claims by and on behalf of consumer groups also suggest that HTA should be informed by a broader set of perspectives. Using the example of the cochlear implant in children, this essay compares the professed objectives of HTA with typical practice and explores possible explanations for the discrepancies observed. A second example, home tele-monitoring for elderly persons, demonstrates how the types of evidence considered by HTA and the process through which assessments are produced may be reconsidered. We argue for the formal integration of the sociopolitical dimensions of health care technologies into assessments. The ability of HTA to more fully address important issues from a public policy point of view will increase by making explicit the sociopolitical nature of health care technologies.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Lehoux, M. Hivon, J.-L. Denis, and S. Tailliez Health Technology Assessment in the Canadian Health Policy Arena: Examining Relationships between Evaluators and Stakeholders Evaluation, July 1, 2008; 14(3): 295 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Boivin, F. Legare, and M.-P. Gagnon Competing norms: Canadian rural family physicians' perceptions of clinical practice guidelines and shared decision-making J Health Serv Res Policy, April 1, 2008; 13(2): 79 - 84. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. May The Clinical Encounter and the Problem of Context Sociology, February 1, 2007; 41(1): 29 - 45. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Lehoux, J.-L. Denis, S. Tailliez, and M. Hivon Dissemination of Health Technology Assessments: Identifying the Visions Guiding an Evolving Policy Innovation in Canada Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, August 1, 2005; 30(4): 603 - 642. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rock Reconstituting populations through evidence-based medicine: an ethnographic account of recommending procedures for diagnosing type 2 diabetes in clinical practice guidelines Health (London) , April 1, 2005; 9(2): 241 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. J. Bozic, R. G. Pierce, and J. H. Herndon Health Care Technology Assessment. Basic Principles and Clinical Applications J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., June 1, 2004; 86(6): 1305 - 1314. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. May, R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F. Mair, P. Wallace, and for the Telemedicine Adoption Study Group Understanding the Normalization of Telemedicine Services through Qualitative Evaluation JAMIA, November 1, 2003; 10(6): 596 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. May, R. Harrison, T. Finch, A. MacFarlane, F. Mair, and P. Wallace Understanding the Normalization of Telemedicine Services through Qualitative Evaluation J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., November 1, 2003; 10(6): 596 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Satya-Murti Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: Essentials of Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice JAMA, March 20, 2002; 287(11): 1464 - 1466. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. May, M. Mort, F. Mair, and T. Williams Factors affecting the adoption of telehealthcare in the United Kingdom: the policy context and the problem of evidence Health Informatics Journal, September 1, 2001; 7(3-4): 131 - 134. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
|