|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract.
This article discusses events that led up to and the aftermath of New Zealand's radical health sector restructuring of 1993. It suggests that "big bang" policy change facilitated the introduction of a set of market-oriented ideas describable as a policy prescription. In general, the new system performed poorly, in keeping with problems of market failure endemic in health care. The system was subsequently restructured, and elements of the 1993 structures were repackaged through a series of incremental changes. Based on the New Zealand experience, big bang produces change but not necessarily a predictive model, and the policy prescription has been oversold.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Gauld The Unintended Consequences of New Zealand's Primary Health Care Reforms Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(1): 93 - 115. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Bevan and R. Robinson The Interplay between Economic and Political Logics: Path Dependency in Health Care in England Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2005; 30(1-2): 53 - 78. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Gauld One Country, Four Systems: Comparing Changing Health Policies in New Zealand International Political Science Review/ Revue internationale de science pol, April 1, 2003; 24(2): 199 - 218. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Peterson Medicare: Intentions, Effects, and Politics Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2001; 26(1): 1 - 6. [PDF] |
||||
|
|