Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 2000 25(3):451-472; DOI:10.1215/03616878-25-3-451
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lantz, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Henson, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Mass Screening in Low-Income Populations: The Challenges of Securing Diagnostic and Treatment Services in a National Cancer Screening Program

Paula M. Lantz
University of Michigan

Lisa C. Richardson
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Lowell E. Sever
Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation

Debra J. Macklem
University of Michigan

Martha L. Hare and Carlyn E. Orians
Battelle Centers for Public Health Research and Evaluation

Rosemarie Henson
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Abstract.

Funding for many mass screening programs for low-income and uninsured populations provides resources for screening tests, yet only rarely does it provide coverage for necessary follow-up diagnostic and treatment services. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP), a federally funded initiative that provides cancer screening to low-income uninsured and under-insured women, covers some diagnostic follow-up tests and no treatment services. We conducted in-depth case studies of seven state programs participating in the NBCCEDP to investigate the strategies and approaches being used to secure diagnostic and treatment services. The results suggest that the program relies on a patchwork of resources—at state and local levels—to provide diagnostic and treatment services. This includes a number of components of local safety nets, all of which are unstable and have uncertain futures. Public health disease-screening initiatives need to reconsider the feasibility of continued reliance on case-by-case appeals to the local safety net for diagnostic follow-up and treatment services.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 2000 by Duke University Press