Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1998 23(2):319-361; DOI:10.1215/03616878-23-2-319
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Paul-Shaheen, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

The States and Health Care Reform: The Road Traveled and Lessons Learned from Seven That Took the Lead

Pamela A. Paul-Shaheen
Michigan Public Health Institute

During the past decade, an area of major policy activity among the states has been that of health care reform. As of May 1993, seven states—Florida, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington—had progressed the furthest in enacting comprehensive statutes designed to expand health insurance coverage and slow the growth of health care costs. This article reviews the activities of these states to achieve health care reform and the lessons learned from those activities. The analysis focuses specifically on identifying the common problems addressed and determining the common factors that maximized states’ opportunities for success. In all, some nine lessons are identified that have relevance for other states wishing to follow a similar road to reform. Most important among these are a "window of opportunity" for policy action, having entrepreneurial leadership to push the reform agenda forward, and support from key stakeholder interests. If these conditions of opportunity, policy entrepreneurship, and stakeholder commitment are met, a state can move forward in addressing key aspects of its health care reform agenda.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PubliusHome page
V. Gray, D. Lowery, J. Monogan, and E. K. Godwin
Incrementing Toward Nowhere: Universal Health Care Coverage in the States
Publius, October 20, 2009; (2009) pjp023v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
A. S. Chen and M. Weir
The Long Shadow of the Past: Risk Pooling and the Political Development of Health Care Reform in the States
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2009; 34(5): 679 - 716.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
N. A. Miller, K. T. Elder, M. Kitchener, Yu Kang, and C. Harrington
Medicaid 1915(c) Waiver Use and Expenditures for Persons Living With HIV/AIDS
Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 2008; 65(3): 338 - 355.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Health Aff (Millwood)Home page
J. E. McDonough, M. Miller, and C. Barber
A Progress Report On State Health Access Reform
Health Aff., March 1, 2008; 27(2): w105 - w115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1998 by Duke University Press