QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Peterson, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

The Limits of Social Learning: Translating Analysis into Action

In what respects does public-policy making reflect social learning, drawing lessons from previous experiences and from the experiences of governments in other settings? Starting with an examination of the effect of policy legacies on current policy making, I present a process model of social learning embedded within the larger policy-making process resting at the intersection of the nation’s constitutional context, technological change, and political influences exogenous to social learning. The model first distinguishes between the structural and the social learning effects of policy legacies. I then conceptually divide social learning into separate streams of substantive learning and situational learning. The effect that each of these has on policy making depends on the relative position of three categories of participants in the policy-making process (experts, organized interests, and politicians), as well as on the scope of the policy issue being considered (ranging from routine change to major reform). This analysis, with reference to recent health care policy making, reveals the full extent to which social learning is often a decidedly political struggle over ideas and information in which advocates promote lessons that serve their specific interests within a given institutional context and political setting. I consider the implications of social learning for understanding likely policy responses to the rise of market forces in health care.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. J. Thompson and C. Burke Federalism by Waiver: MEDICAID and the Transformation of Long-term Care Publius, October 9, 2008; (2008) pjn026v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. M. Esterling Does the Federal Government Learn from the States? Medicaid and the Limits of Expertise in the Intergovernmental Lobby Publius, September 20, 2008; (2008) pjn025v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Peterson The Truth about Health Care: Why Reform Is Not Working in America; The Health Care Mess: How We Got Into It and What It Will Take to Get Out; The Health Care Mess: How We Got Into It and How We'll Get Out of It Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 343 - 357. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. R. Marmor Forecasting American Health Care: How We Got Here and Where We Might Be Going Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(3): 551 - 571. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Klein Learning from Others: Shall the Last Be the First? Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(5): 1267 - 1278. [Abstract] [PDF]