QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kronebusch, K. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Medicaid and the Politics of Groups: Recipients, Providers, and Policy Making

There is a substantial heterogeneity of interests within the Medicaid program. Its major beneficiary groups include the elderly, people with disabilities, children in low-income families, and adults receiving Aid to Families with Dependent Children. Providers who deliver medical services to these recipients represent another set of potential claimants. These groups are likely to be treated differently by the politics that affect the design and management of the Medicaid program. The Medicaid recipient groups vary in several important dimensions: First, the groups differ politically, a dimension that includes their political participation, their relationships to parties and electoral coalitions, the images they present to other political actors, and the legacy of public policies that affect them. Second, the groups have different medical and social needs. Third, the groups differ with respect to economic constraints, including the political economy of labor markets and of government spending programs, and they have differing relationships to the various types of medical providers. The medical providers are themselves political actors with a variety of characteristics that create political advantages relative to recipients, although there is also diversity among providers. The politics of the Medicaid program involves more than simply technical decisions about eligibility, coverage of medical services, reimbursement, and the implementation of managed care initiatives. Instead the differences between the program’s multiple claimants are an important element of current Medicaid politics and the likely path of future reforms.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. L. Ogden and K. Adams Poorhouse to Warehouse: Institutional Long-Term Care in the United States Publius, December 1, 2009; 39(1): 138 - 163. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. A. Miller and V. Mor Balancing Regulatory Controls and Incentives: Toward Smarter and More Transparent Oversight in Long-Term Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 249 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. J. Anton New Federalism and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relationships: The Implications for Health Policy Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(3): 691 - 720. [Abstract] [PDF]

				M. A. Peterson The Limits of Social Learning: Translating Analysis into Action Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(4): 1077 - 1114. [Abstract] [PDF]