Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1997 22(3):721-789; DOI:10.1215/03616878-22-3-721
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oliver, T. R.
Right arrow Articles by Paul-Shaheen, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Translating Ideas into Actions: Entrepreneurial Leadership in State Health Care Reforms

Thomas R. Oliver
University of Maryland—Baltimore County

Pamela Paul-Shaheen
Michigan Public Health Institute

States are often touted as "laboratories" for developing national solutions to social problems. In this article we examine the appropriateness of this metaphor for comprehensive health care reform and attempt to draw lessons about policy innovation from recent state actions. We present evidence from six states that enacted major pieces of health care legislation in the late 1980s or early 1990s: Massachusetts, Oregon, Florida, Minnesota, Vermont, and Washington State. The variation in design casts doubt on the proposition that states can invent plans and programs for other states and the federal government to adopt for themselves. Instead, we argue that it is more accurate to think of states as specialized political markets in which individuals and groups develop and promote innovative products. We examine the factors that might create receptive markets for comprehensive health care reforms and conclude that the critical factor these states shared in common was skilled and committed leadership from "policy entrepreneurs" who formulated the plans for system reform and prominent "investors" who contributed substantial political capital to the development of the reforms. We illustrate different strategies that leaders in these states used to carry out the entrepreneurial tasks of identifying a market opportunity, designing an innovation, attracting political investment, marketing the innovation, and monitoring its early production.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. D. Jacobson and K. E. Warner
Litigation and Public Health Policy Making:The Case of Tobacco Control
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 769 - 804.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. A. Paul-Shaheen
The States and Health Care Reform: The Road Traveled and Lessons Learned from Seven That Took the Lead
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(2): 319 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. S. Weissert and S. L. Silberman
Sending a Policy Signal: State Legislatures, Medical Schools, and Primary Care Mandates
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(5): 743 - 770.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
T. J. Anton
New Federalism and Intergovernmental Fiscal Relationships: The Implications for Health Policy
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(3): 691 - 720.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. A. Peterson
The Limits of Social Learning: Translating Analysis into Action
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(4): 1077 - 1114.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1997 by Duke University Press