Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1997 22(2):595-631; DOI:10.1215/03616878-22-2-595
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Oberlander, J. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Managed Care and Medicare Reform

Jonathan B. Oberlander
University of California, Berkeley

A primary goal of many Medicare reform proposals is to move program beneficiaries into managed care plans operated by private insurance companies. Advocates contend that managed care based reforms? This article summarizes the claims that are made for and against incorporating managed care into Medicare, and reviews evidence from the program’s experience with HMOs on financial savings, benefit coverage, and quality of care. This evidence raises concerns regarding the ability of HMOs to provide adequate care for chronically ill Medicare patients. Moreover, there is considerable uncertainty about the future performance of managed care plans. I therefore conclude that policy makers should move cautiously in embracing managed care and that Medicare should not adopt financial incentives, such as vouchers, that are intended to push beneficiaries into HMOs. However, Medicare beneficiary enrollment in managed care plans is likely to increase substantially in coming years regardless of public policy. It is therefore critical for Medicare to pursue policies that protect the quality of care for elderly and disabled patients in managed care plans; curtail excessive payments to HMOs that result from favorable selection of healthier enrollees; and preserve the current fee-for-service Medicare program. plans, especially health maintenance organizations (HMOs), can save substantial money for the federal government, while also improving the quality of medical care and scope of covered benefits for Medicare enrollees. Should Medicare follow the private sector by adopting managed care–




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
S. J. Balla
Markets, Governments, and HMO Development in the 1990s
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(2): 215 - 238.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. White
Targets and Systems of Health Care Cost Control
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(4): 653 - 696.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. J. Martin
Markets, Medicare, and Making Do: Business Strategies after National Health Care Reform
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(2): 557 - 593.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1997 by Duke University Press