|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
There are two prominent trends in health care today: first, increasing demands for accountability, and second, increasing provision of care through managed care organizations. These trends promote the question: What form of accountability is appropriate to managed care plans? Accountability is the process by which a party justifies its actions and policies. Components of accountability include parties that can be held or hold others accountable, domains and content areas being assessed, and procedures of assessment.
Traditionally, the professional model of accountability has operated in medical care. In this model, physicians establish the standards of accountability and hold each other accountable through professional organizations. This form of accountability seems outdated and inapplicable to managed care plans. The alternatives are the economic and the political models of accountability. In the economic model, medicine becomes more like a commodity, and "exit" (consumers changing providers for reasons of cost and quality) is the dominant procedure of accountability. In the political model, medicine becomes more like a community good, and "voice" (citizens communicating their views in public forums or on policy committees, or in elections for representatives) is the dominant procedure of accountability.
The economic model’s advantages affirm American individualism, make minimal demands on consumers, and use a powerful incentive, money. Its disadvantages undermine health care as a nonmarket good, undermine individual autonomy, undermine good medical practice, impose significant demands on consumers to be informed, sustain differentials of power, and use indirect procedures of accountability.
The political model’s advantages affirm health care as a matter of justice, permit selecting domains other than price and quality for accountability, reinforce good medical practice, and equalize power between patients and physicians. Its disadvantages include inefficiency in decision making, capture by extremists or experts, intractable value conflicts, fragmentation of community, and oppression of minorities.
The political model is the model we should endorse. Its disadvantages can be minimized by proper institutional design. In addition, recent research on managed care plans suggests that the political model may be the best for a competitive marketplace because it can ensure that tough allocation decisions are addressed and improve health through changes in nonmedical aspects of community life.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. C. Ross Regulating Managed Care: Interest Group Competition for Control and Behavioral Health Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(3): 599 - 625. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. J. Emanuel and L. Goldman Protecting Patient Welfare in Managed Care: Six Safeguards Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(4): 635 - 659. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L. A. Aday and S. H. Linder "Community" as the Ideal for Health Care Reform Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 231 - 243. [PDF]
|
|
|
|
