Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1996 21(3):515-542; DOI:10.1215/03616878-21-3-515
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (64)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barnes, D. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bero, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Industry-Funded Research and Conflict of Interest: An Analysis of Research Sponsored by the Tobacco Industry through the Center for Indoor Air Research

Deborah E. Barnes and Lisa A. Bero
University of California, San Francisco

The Center for Indoor Air Research (CIAR) was created by three United States tobacco companies in 1988. Its stated mission is to fund high-quality, objective research related to indoor air, including studies of environmental tobacco smoke (ETS). Because CIAR is financed by the tobacco industry and funds research related to tobacco, it fosters an inherent conflict of interest. We consider whether this conflict of interest has affected the content, quality, or use of research funded by CIAR. We hypothesize that the tobacco industry might be using CIAR to develop scientific data to support its position that ETS is not harmful to health. CIAR funds two types of projects: "Peer-reviewed" projects are awarded after peer review by a group of scientists, whereas "special-reviewed" projects are awarded directly by tobacco industry executives. CIAR’s special-reviewed projects are more likely than its peer-reviewed projects to be related to ETS, to support the tobacco industry position, and to be used by the industry to argue that smoking should not be regulated in public places. Our findings suggest that the tobacco industry is funding special-reviewed projects through CIAR to develop scientific data that it can use in legislative and legal settings. The industry may be financing peer-reviewed projects through CIAR to enhance its credibility, to provide good publicity, and to divert attention from ETS as an indoor air pollutant. CIAR’s stated mission of funding high-quality, objective research has been compromised by conflict of interest, and at least some of CIAR’s projects are being used to promote the tobacco industry’s agenda.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Schizophr BullHome page
J. J. Prochaska, S. M. Hall, and L. A. Bero
Tobacco Use Among Individuals With Schizophrenia: What Role Has the Tobacco Industry Played?
Schizophr Bull, May 1, 2008; 34(3): 555 - 567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. E. Barnes and L. A. Bero
Communications
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(5): 1279 - 1293.
[PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1996 by Duke University Press