Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1995 20(4):885-908; DOI:10.1215/03616878-20-4-885
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jost, T. S.
Right arrow Articles by McHale, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

The British Health Care Reforms, the American Health Care Revolution, and Purchaser/Provider Contracts

Timothy Stoltzfus Jost
Ohio State University

David Hughes and Lesley Griffiths
University of Wales, Swansea

Jean McHale
University of Manchester

The health care systems of the United States and the United Kingdom are changing rapidly. After the Thatcher government’s 1989 white paper, the formerly unified British National Health Service (NHS) was split into purchaser and provider sides, with the NHS District Health Authorities becoming purchasers, and the NHS hospitals, now reconstructed as independent NHS trusts, becoming providers. The U.S. health care system, driven by market forces rather than government fiat, has been moving rapidly toward integration, with increasingly formalized purchaser and provider relationships. Contracts are found at the purchaser/provider interface in both systems. We reviewed American and British purchaser/provider contracts. The contracts address similar issues but often take disparate approaches. These dissimilarities illuminate the profound, continuing differences between the two systems. They also, however, offer possibilities to transfer contracting "technology" between the two contracting cultures.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
N. Wolff
Interactions between Mental Health and Law Enforcement Systems: Problems and Prospects for Cooperation
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(1): 133 - 174.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1995 by Duke University Press