Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1994 19(4):837-864; DOI:10.1215/03616878-19-4-837
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Coughlin, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Winterbottom, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

State Responses to the Medicaid Spending Crisis: 1988 to 1992

Teresa A. Coughlin, Leighton Ku and John Holahan
The Urban Institute

David Heslam
The Urban Institute

Colin Winterbottom
The Urban Institute

In recent years the growth of Medicaid spending has been a serious state budgetary problem. Between 1988 and 1992, state Medicaid expenditures increased at an average annual rate of 21 percent. Even when accounting for funds from special revenue programs, such as provider tax and donation programs, state Medicaid spending increased by 16 percent each year between 1988 and 1992, which is far higher than in previous years. This rapid expenditure growth occurred when states were having economic slowdowns and facing fiscal pressures in many other areas. Using a case study approach, we investigated the strategies used by nine states to address the recent surge in Medicaid spending. Despite fiscal pressures, the states generally avoided large-scale cutbacks in Medicaid. Instead they implemented a wide range of budgetary actions to reduce the effect of Medicaid growth, including incremental program cutbacks, constraining other budgetary sectors, shifting program costs to the federal government, and raising state taxes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
R. L. Kane, R. A. Kane, W. N. Veazie, and R. C. Ladd
Variation in State Spending for Long-Term Care: Factors Associated with More Balanced Systems
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(2): 363 - 390.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
L. D. Gamm and K. J. Benson
The Influence of Governmental Policy on Community Health Partnerships and Community Care Networks: An Analysis of Three Cases
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(5): 771 - 794.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Crit SociolHome page
R. B. Hackey and P. Whitehouse
Managed Care and Medicaid: A Critical Appraisal
Crit Sociol, January 1, 1996; 22(2): 3 - 27.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1994 by Duke University Press