Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1994 19(2):303-333; DOI:10.1215/03616878-19-2-303
Duke University Press
Health Politics Meets Post-Modernism: Its Meaning and Implications for Community Health Organizing
Pauline Vaillancourt Rosenau
University of TexasHouston Health Science Center
In this article, post-modern theory is described and applied to health politics with examples from community health organizing, social movements, and health promotion. Post-modernism questions conventional assumptions about concepts such as representation, participation, empowerment, community, identity, causality, accountability, responsibility, authority, and roles in community health promotion (those of expert, leader, and organizer). I compare post-modern social movements with their modern counterparts: the organizational forms, leadership styles, and substantive intellectual orientations of the two differ. I explain the social planning, community development, and social action models of community health organizing, comparing them with the priorities of post-modern social movements, and show the similarities and differences between them as to structural preferences, process, and strategies. Finally, and most importantly, I present the implicit lessons that post-modernism offers to health politics and outline the strengths and weaknesses of this approach to health politics.

CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Copyright 1994 by Duke University Press