Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1993 18(4):905-925; DOI:10.1215/03616878-18-4-905
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Fournier, G. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Certificate-of-Need Deregulation and Indigent Hospital Care

Ellen S. Campbell
East Carolina University

Gary M. Fournier
Florida State University

For almost twenty years certificate-of-need (CON) regulations have protected existing hospitals from unrestricted competition in services. Although the explicit purpose of CON regulation was to prevent hospitals from duplicating services and investing in costly excess capacity, it has been unsuccessful in accomplishing this goal. On the other hand, CON policies have, we suggest, been pursued with the implicit aim of "cross subsidization," that is, regulators have used their power to issue licenses and restrict competition in order to create an incentive to hospitals to provide high levels of care to the indigent population. Posner (1971) has noted that to achieve cross subsidization, entry into lucrative services must be restricted. We present evidence that CON licenses have been used to promote the internal subsidization of indigent care in probit analysis, based on data from Florida spanning the period 1983- 89. While this method of financing indigent care may be preferred by legislators who do not want to face the political consequences of raising taxes to pay for the service, it has troubling implications for the hospital provision of indigent care, especially in an era of CON deregulation.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. DeLia, J. C. Cantor, A. Tiedemann, and C. S. Huang
Effects of Regulation and Competition on Health Care Disparities: The Case of Cardiac Angiography in New Jersey
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, February 1, 2009; 34(1): 63 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
American Journal of Medical QualityHome page
J. L. Robinson, D. B. Nash, E. Moxey, and J. P. O'Connor
Certificate of Need and the Quality of Cardiac Surgery
American Journal of Medical Quality, September 1, 2001; 16(5): 155 - 160.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. J. Conover and F. A. Sloan
Does Removing Certificate-of-Need Regulations Lead to a Surge in Health Care Spending?
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1998; 23(3): 455 - 481.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
G. D. Schiff, A. B. Bindman, T. A. Brennan, Physicians for a National Health Program Quality o, Schiff, Bindman, T. Bodenheimer, Brennan, C. Clancy, O. Fein, et al.
A Better-Quality Alternative: Single-Payer National Health System Reform
JAMA, September 14, 1994; 272(10): 803 - 808.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1993 by Duke University Press