|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Lay participation in health care decision making has attracted increasing interest in Canada, with numerous provincial government reports advocating this initiative. Interest stems from a number of factors. Among them is a growing recognition that patient preferences ought to be incorporated into decision making that involves individual treatment choices. Another factor is the desire to increase public accountability for decisions on the allocation of health care resources, in order to make providers more accountable to the communities they serve. There is, however, still considerable confusion over what lay participation really means. In addition, little consideration has been given to whether and how lay participation can lead to better decision making and the criteria by which it should be judged. This article presents a framework based on decision-making domains, role perspectives, and levels of participation and is intended as an initial step toward providing greater conceptual clarity regarding the key dimensions and goals of lay participation in health care decision making.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T.-U. Ngoc Nguyen, S. P. Tanjasiri, M. Kagawa-Singer, J. H. Tran, and M. A. Foo Community Health Navigators for Breast- and Cervical-Cancer Screening Among Cambodian and Laotian Women: Intervention Strategies and Relationship-Building Processes Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2008; 9(4): 356 - 367. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Lewis and L. Hinton Citizen and staff involvement in health service decision-making: have National Health Service foundation trusts in England given stakeholders a louder voice? J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 19 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Gollust, K. Apse, B. P. Fuller, P. S. Miller, and B. B. Biesecker Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 35 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
|