Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1993 18(4):881-904; DOI:10.1215/03616878-18-4-881
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (78)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charles, C.
Right arrow Articles by DeMaio, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Lay Participation in Health Care Decision Making: A Conceptual Framework

Cathy Charles and Suzanne DeMaio
McMaster University

Lay participation in health care decision making has attracted increasing interest in Canada, with numerous provincial government reports advocating this initiative. Interest stems from a number of factors. Among them is a growing recognition that patient preferences ought to be incorporated into decision making that involves individual treatment choices. Another factor is the desire to increase public accountability for decisions on the allocation of health care resources, in order to make providers more accountable to the communities they serve. There is, however, still considerable confusion over what lay participation really means. In addition, little consideration has been given to whether and how lay participation can lead to better decision making and the criteria by which it should be judged. This article presents a framework based on decision-making domains, role perspectives, and levels of participation and is intended as an initial step toward providing greater conceptual clarity regarding the key dimensions and goals of lay participation in health care decision making.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Health Promot PractHome page
T.-U. Ngoc Nguyen, S. P. Tanjasiri, M. Kagawa-Singer, J. H. Tran, and M. A. Foo
Community Health Navigators for Breast- and Cervical-Cancer Screening Among Cambodian and Laotian Women: Intervention Strategies and Relationship-Building Processes
Health Promot Pract, October 1, 2008; 9(4): 356 - 367.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
R. Lewis and L. Hinton
Citizen and staff involvement in health service decision-making: have National Health Service foundation trusts in England given stakeholders a louder voice?
J Health Serv Res Policy, January 1, 2008; 13(1): 19 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AJPHHome page
S. E. Gollust, K. Apse, B. P. Fuller, P. S. Miller, and B. B. Biesecker
Community Involvement in Developing Policies for Genetic Testing: Assessing the Interests and Experiences of Individuals Affected by Genetic Conditions
Am J Public Health, January 1, 2005; 95(1): 35 - 41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
D. L. Kodner and C. K. Kyriacou
Bringing Managed Care Home to People With Chronic, Disabling Conditions: Prospects and Challenges for Policy, Practice, and Research
J Aging Health, February 1, 2003; 15(1): 189 - 222.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1993 by Duke University Press