|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Administrative changes have been reshaping health policy for the past decade. One consequence is a more constrained medical profession. Another is a more powerful health care bureaucracy. Most industrialized nations have called on democratic principles to balance professional norms; in contrast, Americans are developing a distinctly bureaucratic health care regime. This article suggests why and explores the ramifications for both the politics of health care and the practice of medicine.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. M. Frankford The Normative Constitution of Professional Power Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 185 - 224. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Disch Publicity-Stunt Participation and Sound Bite Polemics: The Health Care Debate 1993 94 Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, March 1, 1996; 21(1): 3 - 33. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Tanenbaum Medicaid Eligibility Policy in the 1980s: Medical Utilitarianism and the "Deserving" Poor Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 933 - 954. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Frankford Scientism and Economism in the Regulation of Health Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1994; 19(4): 773 - 799. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Frankford Measuring Health Care: Political Fate and Technocratic Reform: Review Essay Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, September 1, 1994; 19(3): 647 - 662. [PDF] |
||||
|
|