QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (57) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stone, D. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

The Struggle for the Soul of Health Insurance

The politics of American health insurance is a struggle over which vision of distributive justice should govern: the solidarity principle or the logic of actuarial fairness. Actuarial fairness is central to American private health insurance. It is both an antiredistributive ideology and a method of organizing mutual aid by fragmenting communities into ever-smaller, more homogeneous groups, leading ultimately to the destruction of mutual aid. This fragmentation is accomplished by fostering in people a sense of their differences and their responsibility for themselves, rather than their commonalities and interdependence. Actuarial fairness developed as a business strategy for gaining market share. Medical underwriting, which is far more extensive than commonly known, is the information technology used for implementing actuarial fairness. Despite significant changes in the political context of health insurance which are leading toward restraints on underwriting, the logic of actuarial fairness is so deeply embedded in the structure of competitive markets in insurance and so deeply consonant with social divisions in American society that eradicating it will take more than any current reform proposals contemplate.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. Stone Protect the sick: health insurance reform in one easy lesson. J. Law Med. Ethics, December 1, 2008; 36(4): 652 - 659. [PDF]

				J. Banja When Harms Become Wrongs: Some Comments on the Moral Language of "Oppression" and the Limitations of Moral Theory Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 2001; 12(2): 79 - 86. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Social and Political Dis-ease Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 181 - 196. [PDF]

				D. M. Frankford Regulating Managed Care: Pulling the Tails to Wag the Dogs Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(5): 1191 - 1200. [PDF]

				D. W. Light The Rhetorics and Realities of Community Health Care: The Limits of Countervailing Powers toMeet the Health Care Needs of the Twenty-first Century Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 105 - 145. [Abstract] [PDF]

				K. Hinrichs The Impact of German Health Insurance Reforms on Redistribution and the Culture of Solidarity Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, September 1, 1995; 20(3): 653 - 687. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. White Commentary-The Horses and the Jumps: Comments on the Health Care Reform Steeplechase Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1995; 20(2): 373 - 383. [PDF]