Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1992 17(4):783-812; DOI:10.1215/03616878-17-4-783
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Barnea, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Private Outlets for Public Limitations: The Rise of Commercial Health Insurance in Israel

Marc A. Cohen and Tamara Barnea
JDC-Brookdale Institute in Jerusalem

In recent years, dissatisfaction with aspects of the Israeli health care system has grown. Labor conflict and unrest, long waits for elective surgery, increases in out-of-pocket payments for health care, and declining government investment have given rise to a new phenomenon: the increasing use of private services. This has led consumers to seek financing sources for their private care and created opportunities for commercial insurers and sick funds to offer new insurance packages to meet this demand. As a result, over the last five years more than twenty commercial health policies and four mandatory supplemental policies provided by the sick funds are currently on the market. The market for these policies is small but growing, with consequences for the cost and quality of care, access, the level and composition of national expenditures, and the allocation of resources to both the public and private health systems. As the balance between private and public financing changes, so too do the trade-offs between differing objectives. Greater private pluralism and competition at the financing level have many advantages but also make it more difficult for government to manage the tradeoffs that occur. Thus, a changed emphasis in government regulation and policy-making is required.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1992 by Duke University Press