QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Evans, R. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation

Canada: The Real Issues

Canadians are, by and large, satisfied with their health care system. It is for them a symbol of their community and distinguishes them from the United States. Unlike the health system of that country, it is universal, comprehensive, and accessible, and it costs less as a percentage of GNP to run. The difference between the two systems is rooted in differences in funding. By providing coverage of medically necessary care under a single nonprofit payer (the provincial governments, with guidance and some funds from the federal government), the Canadian system avoids the large overheads and profit incentives that make a fragmented private insurance industry so expensive and inequitable. Whereas health insurance in Canada is socialized, care is not: patients are free to choose among providers, physicians are primarily in private practice, and hospitals are independent, nonprofit institutions overseen by boards of trustees. Canada and the United States view the challenges confronting the Canadian system differently. To Canadians, the real issue is how to improve the management of a popular, effective, and heretofore affordable system, so as to preserve it in a more hostile economic environment. The specific areas of concern are common to all health care systems in the developed world but bear little resemblance to the misleading images of Canada fabricated in the United States for internal political purposes. For Canadians, the proof of their system is that it works, while millions in the United States go without.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. J. Redden Rationing Care in the Community: Engaging Citizens in Health Care Decision Making Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(6): 1363 - 1389. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. Wilsford States Facing Interests: Struggles over Health Care Policy in Advanced, Industrial Democracies Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, September 1, 1995; 20(3): 571 - 613. [Abstract] [PDF]

				T. R. Marmor Lessons from the Frozen North Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(3): 763 - 770. [PDF]