Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1992 17(3):517-540; DOI:10.1215/03616878-17-3-517
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Clark, R. E.
Right arrow Articles by Dorwart, R. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Competition and Community Mental Health Agencies

Robin E. Clark
Dartmouth College

Robert A. Dorwart
Harvard University

Community mental health agencies (CMHAs) provide most of the institutional outpatient treatment in the United States. A great deal of this care is given to clients at prices below the actual cost of the service. As the number of mental health providers increases, the question of how competition shapes the performance of CMHAs becomes more important. We use a two-stage least-squares model to examine how competition from other outpatient facilities, psychiatrists, and health maintenance organizations (HMOs), coupled with demographic, economic, and organizational factors affects subsidized care in CMHAs. Our analysis shows that competition from psychiatrists and HMOs reduces the number of subsidized visits that CMHAs provide and that agencies in urban areas and those initiated with federal funds provide more subsidized care. By restricting access to outpatient treatment, competition may have adverse long-term consequences for potential clients and for state mental health authorities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?





  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1992 by Duke University Press