Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1992 17(1):39-70; DOI:10.1215/03616878-17-1-39
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fan, D. P.
Right arrow Articles by Norem, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

The Media and the Fate of the Medicare Catastrophic Extension Act

David P. Fan and Lois Norem
University of Minnesota

We examine the Medicare Catastrophic Extension Act of 1988, which was repealed in 1989, finding a broad range of messages on this controversial legislation in the press. The time needed to craft compromise legislation in response to objections to the original bill was cut short by the impending deadline for payments by the elderly, January 1990. Outright repeal rather than modification was the result. Our study confirms earlier studies, which show that trends of opinionin this case that of senior citizens over 65 years of agecould be forecast from mass media stories, and is consistent with the notion that legislation occurs in a climate shaped by the media. In addition to being a key conduit for passing information and pressures to the public and lawmakers, the media could also serve to indicate the impact of messages passed through other channels, such as direct mailings.







  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1992 by Duke University Press