Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1991 16(2):251-279; DOI:10.1215/03616878-16-2-251
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Tax Administration as Health Policy: Hospitals, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Courts

Daniel M. Fox and Daniel C. Schaffer
Milbank Memorial Fund
Northeastern University School of Law

Since 1969 federal tax policy has permitted nonprofit hospitals to turn away indigent patients or to transfer them to public hospitals. The Internal Revenue Service made health policy, but its officials remain convinced that they were not making policy at all. Convinced that it was reasoning from legal principles, the Revenue Service accepted the hospital industry's view of the history and purpose of hospitals. The federal courts further obscured the problem. Moreover, the Revenue Service took no interest in the effects of its ruling on the services provided by tax-exempt hospitals until 1989. We describe these events and seek to explain them by linking the recent history of health policy to the assumptions that govern the making of tax policy. We conclude that the making of health policy by tax officials who are not accountable for it and who believe that they are not making policy at all is not in the public interest.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. A. Alexander, G. J. Young, B. J. Weiner, and L. R. Hearld
Governance and Community Benefit: Are Nonprofit Hospitals Good Candidates for Sarbanes-Oxley Type Reforms?
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 199 - 224.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. Schlesinger, B. Gray, and E. Bradley
Charity and Community: The Role of Nonprofit Ownership in a Managed Health Care System
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1996; 21(4): 697 - 750.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. A. Potter and B. B. Longest Jr.
The Divergence of Federal and State Policies on the Charitable Tax Exemption of Nonprofit Hospitals
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1994; 19(2): 393 - 419.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1991 by Duke University Press