QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:
Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (51) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brennan, T. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Practice Guidelines and Malpractice Litigation: Collision or Cohesion?

Practice guidelines are standardized specifications for managing particular clinical problems and are intended to improve the outcomes of medical care by increasing adherence to standards of care. They are also meant to make medicine more cost-effective by eliminating unnecessary procedures. A relatively recent phenomenon, the practice guidelines now emerging will have implications for malpractice, which also intends to bring about better care. They will probably not revolutionize the procedures that courts use to determine negligence, but judges will integrate guidelines into their decision-making process. This development should be welcomed. Guidelines should prove to be useful as either inculpatory or exculpatory evidence of negligence. They are unlikely to generate much new litigation, although there is some potential for suits against those who issue guidelines, especially if guidelines are not revised as the technology of medical care changes.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. B. Brushwood Liability Implications of Innovative Drug Therapy: The Significance of Clinical Guidelines in Establishing the Legal Standard of Care Journal of Pharmacy Practice, June 1, 2002; 15(3): 279 - 289. [Abstract] [PDF]

				B. A. Liang Error in Medicine: Legal Impediments to U.S. Reform Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 27 - 58. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. D. Jacobson and C. J. Rosenquist The Use of Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents: Technological Change and Defensive Medicine Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 243 - 266. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. L. Hyams, D. W. Shapiro, and T. A. Brennan Medical Practice Guidelines in Malpractice Litigation: An Early Retrospective Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 289 - 313. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. R. Bovbjerg Medical Malpractice: Folklore, Facts, and the Future Ann Intern Med, November 1, 1992; 117(9): 788 - 791. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. R. Gutknecht Meador Revisited: Nondisease in the Nineties Ann Intern Med, May 15, 1992; 116(10): 873 - 874. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. K. Barker The Effects of Tort Reform on Medical Malpractice Insurance Markets: An Empirical Analysis Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, March 1, 1992; 17(1): 143 - 161. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. W. Garnick, A. M. Hendricks, and T. A. Brennan Can Practice Guidelines Reduce the Number and Costs of Malpractice Claims? JAMA, November 27, 1991; 266(20): 2856 - 2860. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E. B. Hirshfeld Should Practice Parameters Be the Standard of Care in Malpractice Litigation? JAMA, November 27, 1991; 266(20): 2886 - 2891. [PDF]