Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1991 16(1):67-85; DOI:10.1215/03616878-16-1-67
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (51)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Practice Guidelines and Malpractice Litigation: Collision or Cohesion?

Troyen A. Brennan
Brigham and Women's Hospital

Practice guidelines are standardized specifications for managing particular clinical problems and are intended to improve the outcomes of medical care by increasing adherence to standards of care. They are also meant to make medicine more cost-effective by eliminating unnecessary procedures. A relatively recent phenomenon, the practice guidelines now emerging will have implications for malpractice, which also intends to bring about better care. They will probably not revolutionize the procedures that courts use to determine negligence, but judges will integrate guidelines into their decision-making process. This development should be welcomed. Guidelines should prove to be useful as either inculpatory or exculpatory evidence of negligence. They are unlikely to generate much new litigation, although there is some potential for suits against those who issue guidelines, especially if guidelines are not revised as the technology of medical care changes.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
B. A. Liang
Error in Medicine: Legal Impediments to U.S. Reform
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(1): 27 - 58.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
P. D. Jacobson and C. J. Rosenquist
The Use of Low-Osmolar Contrast Agents: Technological Change and Defensive Medicine
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 243 - 266.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
A. L. Hyams, D. W. Shapiro, and T. A. Brennan
Medical Practice Guidelines in Malpractice Litigation: An Early Retrospective
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 289 - 313.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. K. Barker
The Effects of Tort Reform on Medical Malpractice Insurance Markets: An Empirical Analysis
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, March 1, 1992; 17(1): 143 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1991 by Duke University Press