Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1991 16(1):121-134; DOI:10.1215/03616878-16-1-121
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prottas, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Batten, H. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

The Willingness to Give: The Public and the Supply of Transplantable Organs

Jeffrey M. Prottas and Helen Levine Batten
Brandeis University

We report the results of a representative random-sample telephone survey of the public's willingness to donate organs. Our goal was to identify differences within the public and target groups who might be receptive to educational efforts to increase donation. We distinguish differences in attitude and demographic characteristics in three groups: those committed to donation, those opposed, and those who might change their opinions with more specific information. While approval of donation is nearly universal, only about half of the public would donate a relative's organs when they do not know the relative's preference. Whites, higher-income individuals, and those with higher educational levels were more favorable. Those who might change their minds fall midway between those committed and those opposed, both demographically and by attitude. They include more nonwhites and more individuals with incomes less than $25,000 than members of the group committed to donation. Targeting public education messages to this group is likely to have the most success in reducing the gap between supply and demand for human organs.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nurs EthicsHome page
B. L Neades
Presumed Consent to Organ Donation in Three European Countries
Nursing Ethics, May 1, 2009; 16(3): 267 - 282.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. Spital
Mandated Choice: A Plan to Increase Public Commitment to Organ Donation
JAMA, February 8, 1995; 273(6): 504 - 506.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. W. Evans
Organ Procurement Expenditures and the Role of Financial Incentives
JAMA, June 23, 1993; 269(24): 3113 - 3118.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. J. Youngner, R. M. Arnold, the Working Group on Ethical, Psychosocial, and Pu, J. Burdick, A. Caplan, J. Childress, D. Cole, M. DeVita, R. Fox, J. Frader, et al.
Ethical, Psychosocial, and Public Policy Implications of Procuring Organs From Non--Heart-Beating Cadaver Donors
JAMA, June 2, 1993; 269(21): 2769 - 2774.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1991 by Duke University Press