|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
There is mounting pressure at the federal (and state) level to require employers to provide health insurance to their employees. However, two quite different groups of workers could be affected by such a mandate. In addition, there are at least five major problems with requiring employers to provide health insurance. Chief among these is the further fracturing of the insurance market, so that the spreading of risk will be reduced, and only the young and healthy will be offered insurance at relatively low premiums. We should be designing a health insurance system that has both universal coverage and a cost-containment structure. Toward this end, we need to tackle issues that transcend alternative methods of financing health care in the U.S.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. C. Lewin and P. A. Sybinsky Hawaii's Employer Mandate and Its Contribution to Universal Access JAMA, May 19, 1993; 269(19): 2538 - 2543. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. J. Martin Together Again: Business, Government, and the Quest for Cost Control Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(2): 359 - 393. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. S. Jecker Can an Employer-based Health Insurance System Be Just? Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(3): 657 - 673. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. A. Rochefort The Pragmatic Appeal of Employment-based Health Care Reform Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(3): 683 - 693. [PDF] |
||||
|
|