Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1990 15(4):755-778; DOI:10.1215/03616878-15-4-755
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (14)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cantor, J. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Expanding Health Insurance Coverage: Who Will Pay?

Joel C. Cantor
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Recent discussions on extending health insurance to the more than thirty million uninsured Americans have focused on two strategies: expanding the Medicaid program and mandating that employers sponsor coverage for their employees. This analysis, using a microsimulation model of the U.S. health care financing system, suggests that these two options would result in very different distributions of financial burden. Employer-sponsored coverage is financed in a highly regressive fashion, in contrast to the Medicaid program, which is proportional to income. Furthermore, the burden of paying for health care under Medicaid varies little among generations, whereas the cost of employer-sponsored care is lowest in households headed by persons over sixty-five years old. Low health status populations do not pay disproportionately higher taxes or premiums to finance either the Medicaid program or employer-sponsored coverage. Their incomes, however, are more effectively protected by Medicaid, because it offers more comprehensive benefits.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. Bodenheimer and K. Grumbach
Paying for Health Care
JAMA, August 24, 1994; 272(8): 634 - 639.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
N. S. Jecker
Can an Employer-based Health Insurance System Be Just?
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(3): 657 - 673.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. A. Rochefort
The Pragmatic Appeal of Employment-based Health Care Reform
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1993; 18(3): 683 - 693.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
T. Bodenheimer and K. Grumbach
Financing Universal Health Insurance: Taxes, Premiums, and the Lessons of Social Insurance
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, September 1, 1992; 17(3): 439 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
E. R. Brown
Health USA: A National Health Program for the United States
JAMA, January 22, 1992; 267(4): 552 - 558.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1990 by Duke University Press