Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1989 14(4):663-689; DOI:10.1215/03616878-14-4-663
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (47)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sloan, F. A.
Right arrow Articles by Bovbjerg, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Effects of Tort Reforms on the Value of Closed Medical Malpractice Claims: A Microanalysis

Frank A. Sloan and Paula M. Mergenhagen
Vanderbilt University

Randall R. Bovbjerg
The Urban Institute

Tort reforms enacted by state legislatures mainly seek to reduce the rate of increase in medical malpractice insurance premiums and other costs of the professional liability system, such as "defensive medicine." We examine the effects tort reforms enacted during the 1970s have had on the probability that a claim will be paid, the amount of payment, and the speed with which the claim is resolved. Claims frequency is not used as a variable in this analysis, but findings from other studies pertaining to frequency are noted. This study uses two closed claims databases–one from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, and one from the U.S. General Accounting Office. We merged the two data sets for purposes of this analysis. The observational unit was the individual claim. Data on tort reforms came from our own analysis of statutory changes by state. Dollar ceilings on recoveries ("caps") are shown to be the strongest reforms in terms of their impact on paid claim size. Most caps limit recovery for noneconomic loss, though some limit dollar awards. Other reforms that reduced payments per claim were costs awardable provisions and mandatory collateral offsets.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
S. J. Spurr and W. O. Simmons
Medical Malpractice in Michigan: An Economic Analysis
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1996; 21(2): 315 - 346.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
R. R. Bovbjerg
Lessons for Tort Reform from Indiana
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, September 1, 1991; 16(3): 465 - 482.
[PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. D. Jacobson
Medical Malpractice and the Tort System-Reply
JAMA, April 25, 1990; 263(16): 2180 - 2181.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1989 by Duke University Press