Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1989 14(2):239-260; DOI:10.1215/03616878-14-2-239
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fox, D. M.
Right arrow Articles by Schaffer, D. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Health Policy and ERISA: Interest Groups and Semipreemption

Daniel M. Fox
State University of New York at Stony Brook

Daniel C. Schaffer
Northeastern University School of Law

This paper is a history of the health policy results of the Employee Retirement and Income Security Act of 1974, particularly section 514, which preempts state laws "which relate to any employee benefit plan" but permits states to continue to regulate the business of insurance. This history exemplifies how health policy is often made outside conventional arenas. On the basis of published primary sources and interviews with a number of key participants, the paper describes how interest groups which rarely act together coalesced to create and sustain semipreemption and its effects on state and federal health policy. The paper concludes with an asessment of recent state legislative efforts to address the problems created by ERISA semi-preemption. The ironical results of semipreemption occurred because of the absence of a coalition of interest groups that was sufficiently strong to resolve the fundamental questions raised by our commitment to linking health insurance to employment.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
D. M. Fox
Strengthening State Government through Oversight
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(5): 1185 - 1190.
[PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
J. A. Marsteller, R. R. Bovbjerg, L. M. Nichols, and D. K. Verrilli
The Resurgence of Selective Contracting Restrictions
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(5): 1133 - 1189.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
L. D. Brown
The Medically Uninsured: Problems, Policies, and Politics
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, June 1, 1990; 15(2): 413 - 426.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1989 by Duke University Press