Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1987 12(3):391-408; DOI:10.1215/03616878-12-3-391
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thorpe, K. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Duke University Press

Does All-Payer Rate Setting Work? The Case of the New York Prospective Hospital Reimbursement Methodology

Kenneth E. Thorpe
Harvard University

By 1983, four states had received waivers from the Health Care Financing Administration and adopted experimental reimbursement programs covering all third-party payers. In general, these programs were designed to moderate cost growth as well as to promote a number of broader distributive objectives. Among the concerns for equity were financing uncompensated care and spreading the costs across all payers, reducing the differential between hospital charges and costs, and rejuvenating fiscally distressed hospitals. These diverse goals represent a fundamental shift in the role of state rate setting; as a result, broader outcome measures are required to determine their overall impact. The New York Prospective Hospital Reimbursement Methodology (NYPHRM) is evaluated in this broader context. The NYPHRM successfully channeled revenues to fiscally blighted hospitals, increasing the volume of care to the uninsured while maintaining cost growth at national levels. According to this broader set of outcome measures, the NYPHRM would be viewed as a policy success.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
A. S. Chen and M. Weir
The Long Shadow of the Past: Risk Pooling and the Political Development of Health Care Reform in the States
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, October 1, 2009; 34(5): 679 - 716.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
M. D. Rosko
All-Payer Rate-Setting and the Provision of Hospital Care to the Uninsured: The New Jersey Experience
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1990; 15(4): 815 - 831.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. C. Robinson and H. S. Luft
Competition, Regulation, and Hospital Costs, 1982 to 1986
JAMA, November 11, 1988; 260(18): 2676 - 2681.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1987 by Duke University Press