Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1987 12(2):221-236; DOI:10.1215/03616878-12-2-221
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (40)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perloff, J. D.
Right arrow Articles by Neckerman, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Physicians' Decisions to Limit Medicaid Participation: Determinants and Policy Implications

Janet D. Perloff
University of Illinois (Chicago)

Phillip R. Kletke
American Medical Association

Kathryn M. Neckerman
University of Chicago

Although most primary care physicians participate in state Medicaid programs, they may accept all Medicaid patients, or they may choose to limit their participation. This decision allows physicians to adjust their Medicaid caseloads to a desired level, and it has important implications for the access of low-income patients to health care. Surveys of pediatricians in 1978 and 1983 indicate that the proportion of pediatricians limiting their Medicaid participation increased significantly from 26 percent to 35 percent (p > .001). In addition, in both 1978 and 1983, limited participants saw significantly fewer Medicaid patients than full participants. This paper describes a number of strategies available to federal and state policymakers for fostering full Medicaid participation. Multivariate analyses indicate that increasing reimbursement levels is an important strategy for encouraging full Medicaid participation. In addition, full participants will increase their Medicaid caseloads in response to a variety of Medicaid policy incentives, while limited participants are found to respond to fewer policy incentives. The authors conclude that caution will be needed to ensure that health care cost-containment strategies such as capitation or selective contracting do not inadvertently discourage participation among both full and limited Medicaid participants.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
T. Rice, S. C. Stearns, D. E. Pathman, S. DesHarnais, M. Brasure, and M. Tai-Seale
A Tale of Two Bounties: The Impact of Competing Fees on Physician Behavior
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1999; 24(6): 1307 - 1330.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
G. Silverstein
Physicians' Perceptions of Commercial and Medicaid Managed Care Plans: A Comparison
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 1997; 22(1): 5 - 21.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Fam MedHome page
S. Cykert and R. T. Layson
Will Universal Health Insurance Assure Universal Access to Ongoing Primary Care for Adults?
Arch Fam Med, November 1, 1993; 2(11): 1153 - 1155.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1987 by Duke University Press