Home Duke University Press
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 1985 10(1):119-139; DOI:10.1215/03616878-10-1-119
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schuttinga, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Steinwald, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Duke University Press

Health Plan Selection in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program

James A. Schuttinga, Marilyn Falik and Bruce Steinwald
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

A survey of over 8,500 employees of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) during the May 1982 open season, supplemented by enrollment data for all DHHS employees enrolled in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program (FEHBP), was used to study insurance plan selection when multiple fee-for-service options as well as HMOs are available. There is evidence of biased selection of health risks in the FEHBP, yet historically the program has exhibited considerable stability. The stability may be attributable partly to control over entry and over changes in benefits and premiums and partly to inertia on the part of enrollees. In spite of large changes in relative premiums and benefits, only 21 percent of all enrollees in the DHHS switched plans during the May 1982 open season. Those employees who did switch plans astutely identified bargains; on average they lowered their annual contribution to premium by almost 40 percent while maintaining the level of benefits. Insurance plans offering relatively generous coverage of a particular service attract a disproportionately high share of enrollees who expect substantial use of that service. The extent of adverse or beneficial selection into HMOs depends on the price and the comprehensiveness of benefits of each available fee-for-service option.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. W. Madden, A. Cheadle, P. Diehr, D. P. Martin, D. L. Patrick, and S. M. Skillman
Voluntary Public Health Insurance for Low-Income Families: The Decision to Enroll
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 955 - 972.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
T. Rice, L. Nelson, and D. C. Colby
Will Medicare Beneficiaries Switch Physicians? A Test of Economic Competition
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, March 1, 1992; 17(1): 3 - 24.
[Abstract] [PDF]




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents


Copyright 1985 by Duke University Press